Open Source vs Closed Source
Just came back from the Open Source vs Closed Source debate. It’s inspiring and quite entertaining with an unplaned swap side drama half way through the debate.
Here is a quick recap,
- Free as in freedom, not as in free beer, in the open source world.
- Majority of people there liked the open source side of the debate. (Because of the swap side thing, we don’t know who is who, but people voted for open source)
- People don’t always trust open source software for important things like medical applications. One reason is that there is no one to sue if something goes wrong
- Open source software tends to have higher chance to fix security problems before they happen. Closed source software has no chance of doing that
- Job security is higher in open source software dealers. If a closed source software company decides to cease development on their software for whatever reasons, their dealers would suffer
- Microsoft made what people like, that’s why they are successful
- People dislike monopoly rather than Microsoft, there are differences between the two
- Microsoft’s monopoly is MS Office, not windows like many people think. Even open source dealers are using MS Office for their own business. It’s just better
- Patents mean to encourage innovation. But the over use of patent can effectively work against innovation. The effective period of patents may need to be shorten
- Patents are good for attracting investment regardless if they are good for innovation
- Open source could hold the key to end software piracy
- It wouldn’t help to believe religiously one side of the argument. Rational analysis is needed
- Businesses don’t particularly care about open or closed source, they use whatever is commercially viable
- Open source licenses are there to protect the software from becoming closed source, not to prevent people from making profit
- Some companies charge a license fee for extensions of open source software
- Companies dealing with open source software can be profitable. There are proven successful business models
- The existence of open source forces closed source companies to be more competitive. It’s good for innovation
- The co-existence of open and closed source worlds will likely continue with open source software playing a more important or even predominant role in the future
Well, that’s enough for more debates. Comment here to express your view if you like.














































